Widower urges change in law after wife killer found guilty under 1861 legislation
Radical changes to an “outdated” law have been demanded by a grieving widower to tackle “irresponsible and reckless” cyclists after a former courier was convicted of knocking down and killing his wife while riding an illegal bicycle.
Radical changes to an “outdated” law have been demanded by a grieving widower to tackle “irresponsible and reckless” cyclists after a former courier was convicted of knocking down and killing his wife while riding an illegal bicycle. Charlie Alliston, then 18, was travelling at 18mph on a fixed-wheel track cycle with no front brakes before he crashed into 44-year-old Kim Briggs as she crossed a busy street in London in February last year. Prosecutors took the unprecedented step of bringing a manslaughter charge due to the unusually grave circumstances of the case. Jurors took more than 12 hours to find Alliston not guilty of manslaughter but convicted him of a lesser offence of causing bodily harm by `wanton and furious driving` under the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, which carries a maximum sentence of two years in jail. Judge Wendy Joseph QC said she is considering a prison term when she sentences Alliston on September 18, adding: “I have not seen one iota of remorse from Mr Alliston at all, at any stage.” Outside court, Mrs Briggs` widower Matthew called for a new Act of causing death by dangerous cycling. He said: “I am now determined to do what I can to prevent others from going through the heartache we have had to bear following Kim`s needless death. “We need to radically change some aspects of our cycling culture. “This is not a witch hunt against all cyclists, only the irresponsible and reckless. “We all have to share these imperfect streets, let`s do so with care and due regard for each other. “The current law is outdated and has not kept pace with the huge increase in the number of people cycling and the associated increased risk of collisions, nor the attitude of some cyclists. “We need to change the way the law deals with this. “I am calling for an introduction of laws of causing death or serious injury by dangerous or careless cycling, thereby bringing cycling laws into line with the Road Traffic Act.” The Old Bailey had heard how Alliston, wearing a top with Anti Social on it, had been on his way to buy food for his girlfriend when he crashed into Mrs Briggs during her lunch break. As she crossed the capital`s Old Street, he twice shouted for her to get out of the way but failed to stop or avoid the head-on collision. He sprang up and continued to shout at his victim as she lay in the road with catastrophic head injuries. Mrs Briggs died in hospital a week later. Alliston criticised Mrs Briggs and claimed she was responsible for the crash in a string of posts on social media in the days that followed. On an internet forum for fixed-wheel bike enthusiasts, he described how he twice warned Mrs Briggs to “get the f*** outta my way”. He wrote: “We collided pretty hard, our heads hit together, hers went into the floor and ricocheted into mine. “It is a pretty serious incident so I won`t bother saying oh she deserved it, it`s her fault. “Yes it is her fault but no she did not deserve it. “Hopefully, it is a lesson learned on her behalf, it shouldn`t have happened like it did but what more can I say.” He complained: “It`s not my fault people either think they are invincible or have zero respect for cyclists.” He later deleted the comments when he realised how serious Mrs Briggs` injuries were. Jurors heard Alliston`s trendy “fixie” bike was not legal to use on the road without being modified to add a front brake. He bought the £700 Planet X bike second-hand for £470 in January last year, telling the vendor he wanted to use it for track cycling. Crash investigators who studied CCTV of the incident concluded Alliston would have been able to stop and avoid the collision if the bike had been fitted with a front brake. But giving evidence in his trial, Alliston, now 20, from Bermondsey, south London, claimed not to know the bike was illegal on the road and told jurors he was not riding recklessly. He said: “At all times I would know what I`m doing and completely responsible for my actions. “I did no