Threat level reduction raises question over arming of PSNI officers, report says
A reduction in the threat level in Northern Ireland raises a question over the criteria for arming all Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) officers, a new report has said.
The Northern Ireland Policing Board (NIPB) also said the fact that the weapons are rarely discharged means the force should consider the issue as part of its long-term plans.
Unlike in the rest of the UK and the Republic of Ireland, in Northern Ireland all police officers currently carry Glock handguns.
The board has published its annual human rights report, along with a special report examining the use of force by the PSNI.
The report into use of force contains a chapter on firearms.
It states: “In Northern Ireland, the chief constable has given standing authority for all officers, subject to successful training, to be issued with a personal issue handgun which may be carried when officers are both on and off duty.
“In the rest of the UK, only highly trained authorised firearms officers (AFO) carry firearms.”
The report said that officers can lawfully discharge a firearm only when they believe it is absolutely necessary to do so in order to save life or prevent serious injury.
All discharges of a firearm must be referred to the Police Ombudsman.
The report said: “The use of firearms has fluctuated over the course of the past ten years.
“Firearms were drawn 364 times in 2012/13, compared with 440 times in 2021/22.
“Firearms have only been discharged five times over the past ten years.
“The last incident involving firearms was an unintentional discharge in June 2022 and has been referred to the Ombudsman.”
The report recommends: “The reduction in the security threat level in Northern Ireland and the fact that officers very rarely have to fire their firearms raises a question about what the criteria should be for issuing firearms to all officers rather than, as in the rest of the UK and the Republic of Ireland, only to those specially trained in their use.
“The PSNI should consider this issue as part of its longer-term plans.”
Last year, MI5 took the decision to reduce the threat level in Northern Ireland from severe to substantial for the first time in 12 years.
The report also recommends that the PSNI should contract an independent research body to ascertain the effect of injuries to individuals hit by plastic bullets or stun grenades or bitten by police dogs.
Commenting on the publication of the two reports, Policing Board chair Deirdre Toner said: “The findings and recommendations made in these latest detailed reports reinforce the importance of oversight, ensuring the Police Service continues to meets its human rights responsibilities and delivers a rights-based approach in all aspects of its service.
“The police have access to an extensive range of powers to support delivery of their duties.
“It is therefore essential for confidence in the service that the public can be assured police powers are being used both legitimately and proportionately.
“The findings and recommendations made within these reports also helps ensure that knowledge and understanding of the impact human rights has on policing increases within the service and the wider community.”
PSNI Deputy Chief Constable Mark Hamilton said: “We welcome these reports.
“Human rights are central to everything we do as police officers and the oversight provided by the Policing Board is key to maintaining public confidence in policing.
“We will continue to work alongside the Policing Board’s independent human rights adviser as we consider and respond to the content of these wide-ranging reports.”
Patrick Corrigan, Amnesty International’s Northern Ireland programme director, welcomed the Policing Board recommendation on the arming of officers.
He said: “Having specially trained AFOs who provide an armed response where it is reasonable, proportionate and lawful to do so, would bring the PSNI more into line with policing in the rest of the UK and Ireland.
“United Nations basic principles on policing recommend that law enforcement officials should apply non-violent means where at all possible before resorting to the use of force and firearms.”